During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Share this on Hacker News.
亲子活动，激光版听到这些，我还是很欣慰的，觉得孩子真的很勇敢、很独立，成长的很快。。Line官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
坚持精准方略，激发内力，调动广大农民的积极性、主动性、创造性。
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
FirstFT: the day's biggest stories，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
This month Ofgem, the UK's energy market regulator, said a surge in demand for grid connections last year had been "driven by the rapid growth" of data centres.